make this go VIRAL -- NO NUKES!
WE [ALMOST] HAVE A MAJORITY NOW! *
~ not bad for WALL STREET journal
PLEASE VOTE NO AND SHARE SHARE SHARE!
#nonukes TAKES THE LEAD October 12
#nonukes TAKES THE LEAD ~ WSJ: Nukes? yes or NO! 49.9 yes/ 50.1 NO! rceezwhatsup.blogspot.com/2012/10/should… < #OcNuke
— Robert Cherwink (@r_cherwink) October 12, 2012
i think this is impressive - WALL STREET JOURNAL! - we can really send a message to the business community with this. of course most of them don't realize how bad nukes are because they have been misled but mostly don't think about it, unless they are making money on it - and also with many of them devious in their ways -- we have to convince them it is a really bad idea no matter how you look at it - even just as investment sense!
#NoNukes LEAD CONTINUES TO GROW
47.2 yes / 52.8 NO!!
(8976 / 10,025)
it started at about 3/1 (was 73% YES / 27 % NO on Wednesday 26 Sept @5:30)
@ 22:20 US Pacific 11 Oct 2012 WE TAKE THE LEAD! --
@ 10:54 US Pacific 17 Oct 2012: #NoNukes LEAD CONTINUES TO GROW, 47.1 yes / 52.9 NO!! (8988 / 10,083) --
@ 9:45 US Pacific 18 Oct 2012: #NoNukes LEAD STEADY, 47.1 yes / 52.9 NO!! (9006 / 10,120)
@ 23:15 US Pacific 21 Oct 2012: #NoNukes LEAD DECLINES a point, 47.1 yes / 52.9 NO!! (9084 / 10,167)
23:15 US Pacific 22 Oct 2012
#NoNukes LEAD DECLINE CONTINUES
47.3 yes / 52.7 NO!!
(9161 / 10,187)
PETITION: Nuclear Power: Too dangerous. Too expensive. Not worth it. change.org/petitions/nucl… via @change
also at WSJ
- Do We Need Subsidies for Solar and Wind Power?
- Should There Be a Price on Carbon?
- Should Washington Block the Keystone Pipeline?