Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Nuke Industry Double Standards?


Fairewinds Kevin Hurley, Maggie Gundersen, and Arnie Gundersen share this podcast. Kevin and Maggie discuss the recent internet attack against the Fairewinds website. Arnie, Maggie and Kevin discuss the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's double standard of allowing Nuclear Senior managers off the hook for significant violations while strongly reprimanding, firing, or filing criminal charges against its technicians and engineers. Lastly, Arnie Gundersen then discusses saltwater intrusions and what that means for Japan's Hamaoka nuclear plant and how nuke speak is used to confuse the general public and press.

LISTEN: Nuke Industry Double Standards? | Fairewinds Energy Education


Boxer and Markey call on NRC to investigate safety concerns at #SanOnofre


Subject: Chairman Boxer and Rep. Markey Call on NRC to Investigate New Safety Concerns at Southern California Nuclear Plant

For Immediate Release
February 6, 2013

U.S. Senate Committee on
Environment and Public Works

Chairman Boxer and Rep. Markey Call on NRC to Investigate New Safety Concerns at Southern California Nuclear Plant

Washington, DC – Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (EPW), and Representative Ed Markey (D-MA), Ranking Member of the House Natural Resources Committee, sent a letter today to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Chairman, Dr. Allison M. Macfarlane, urging the NRC to immediately investigate new information that indicates Southern California Edison (SCE) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) were aware of problems with the design of the San Onofre nuclear power plant’s replacement steam generators before they were installed. The new information also raises concerns that SCE and MHI rejected enhanced safety modifications and avoided triggering a more rigorous license amendment and safety review process.

The full text of the letter is below:

The Honorable Allison M. Macfarlane
Chairman
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
11555 Rockville Pike
Rockville, MD 20852

Dear Chairman Macfarlane:

We have become aware of new information contained in a 2012 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) document entitled “Root Cause Analysis Report for tube wear identified in the Unit 2 and Unit 3 Steam Generators of San Onofre Generating Station” (Report).

We strongly urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to promptly initiate an investigation concerning the troubling information contained in this Report.

The Report indicates that Southern California Edison (SCE) and MHI were aware of serious problems with the design of San Onofre nuclear power plant’s replacement steam generators before they were installed. Further, the Report asserts that SCE and MHI rejected enhanced safety modifications and avoided triggering a more rigorous license amendment and safety review process.

For example, the Report states that although SCE and MHI accepted some adjustments to the replacement steam generators, further safety modifications were found to have “unacceptable consequences” and were rejected: “Among the difficulties associated with the potential changes was the possibility that making them could impede the ability to justify the RSG [replacement steam generator] design” without the requirement for a license amendment. The Report also indicates that SCE’s and MHI’s decision to reject additional safety modifications contributed to the faulty steam generators and the shutdown of reactor Units 2 and 3.

This newly-obtained information concerns us greatly, and we urge the NRC to immediately conduct a thorough investigation into whether SCE and MHI did in fact fail to make needed safety enhancements to avoid the license amendment process.

All people in our nation, including the 8.7 million people who live within 50 miles of the San Onofre plant, must have confidence in the NRC’s commitment to put safety before any other concern.

We believe this alarming Report raises serious concerns about SCE’s and MHI’s past actions. Safety, not regulatory short cuts, must be the driving factor in the design of nuclear facilities, as well as NRC’s determination on whether Units 2 and 3 can be restarted.

We look forward to your prompt response detailing how public safety will be assured in light of this information.

Sincerely,

Barbara Boxer      Edward J. Markey
Chairman Member of Congress
Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Duke Energy Shuts Down Crystal River Nuclear Plant | Greenpeace Blogs



Duke Energy has made some big moves these past few days, including shutting down two coal-fired power plants in North Carolina.

After years of failed repair attempts to repair a broken nuclear reactor in Florida and years more of stalling, Duke Energy has finally accepted the inevitable, and decided to retire the Crystal River nuclear plant.

Floridians like me can breathe a sigh of relief knowing that they no longer face the potential threat of an unsafe, damaged nuclear reactor being allowed to limp along indefinitely.

This closure hits close to home for me. I grew up in Florida, just south of the damaged reactor. My electric bill went up to pay for this plant and the possible construction of others. I’ve watched the controversy around Crystal River explode in recent months from afar, while fighting Duke Energy’s dirty power plants in Ohio.

A little about today’s news.

The Crystal River nuclear plant, located 80 miles north of Tampa, has been inactive since 2009, when its owner at the time, Progress Energy, began to upgrade the 36-year-old nuclear plant and discovered that the reactor’s containment dome, the last line of defense against the release of radiation, was badly cracked and in need of repair.  Repair costs were estimated at $3.4 billion, and that bill was to be footed by ratepayers like me and my family. Progress, which merged with Duke last year, has spent millions of dollars of ratepayers’ money in an attempt to fix the plant — no such luck. They failed, and repair efforts damaged the plant even more.

Unfortunately customers’ pocket books are not off the hook for the mess that is Crystal River. Ratepayers will have to pay $1.3 billion for the upgrade that broke the plant. All in all, it is looking like ratepayers will be out $2 billion for the plant.

The whole sordid story proves the simple facts that we all should know by now: Nuclear energy is dangerous, and nuclear energy is so expensive that there’s no way for a company like Duke to build a power plant unless it fleeces regular ratepayers like you and me to pay for it.

Duke Energy CEO Jim Rogers said that the decision to retire Crystal River was in the best interest of the customers, investors, state of Florida, and the company.

If that’s true, then why are Rogers and Duke simultaneously pursuing an agenda that includes the construction of another nuclear power plant in Levy County, Florida?

If that’s true, then why are Rogers and Duke trying to pass a law in North Carolina that would put North Carolina ratepayers on the hook for even more nuclear power plants there, despite the warnings of Florida’s politicians, who know how badly this can go.

Duke seems to have finally given up a lost cause in Crystal River, but as the nation’s largest utility, it should be leading the way forward to a clean and renewable energy future, not trying to fool customers into more dumb nuclear investments destined to repeat Crystal River’s fate.


Duke Energy Shuts Down Crystal River Nuclear Plant | Greenpeace Blogs

Pandora's False Promises - Pandora's People: Not who the film's publicity claims they are



Pandora’s Promise
 is a new documentary by Robert Stone whose website, Robert Stone Productions, proclaims: “The film is anchored around the personal narratives of a growing number of leading former anti-nuclear activists and pioneering scientists.” The film’s website also asserts that nuclear power is “now passionately embraced by many of those who once led the charge against it.”
Our research found that there is no evidence that any member of the “cast” of Pandora’s Promise ever led the anti-nuclear movement. READ OUR FACT SHEET.
The film’s participants advocate for the deployment of the Integral Fast Reactor (IFR) as the best pathway to addressing climate change, a canceled breeder reactor design whose so-called “Generation IV” iteration, re-considered by the George W. Bush administration, does not exist anywhere in the world.
If Stone had interviewed those with the authority and credentials in the areas he covers — even without featuring them in his film — and then still come to the conclusions he has today reached, his credibility might be intact. But Stone apparently chose not to talk to those with genuine research credentials and depth of knowledge on the issue and whose evidence would have contradicted his film’s protagonists. Therefore, we must reluctantly conclude that Stone’s agenda was to produce a propaganda piece. 
Here we fact check the credentials of those members of the Pandora’s Promise “cast” who allegedly fit the profile of “leading former anti-nuclear activists.” (The film also includes two scientists who worked on the original IFR program at the Argonne National Laboratory, Len Koch and Charles Till, not profiled here, whose vested interest in the technology is self-evident).


Beyond Nuclear - Pandora's False Promises - Pandora's People: Not who the film's publicity claims they are


Chernobyl | Magnum In Motion

Sunday, February 3, 2013

Protesters Block Uranium Train | Stop G.E.'s Uranium Factory in West End Toronto



TORONTO, Ont. (03/02/13) Protesters celebrate moments after successfully stopping a westbound CN Rail train on Bartlett Avenue, between Dupont Street and Geary Avenue. The protest was against a GE uranium processing plant in the west end of Toronto.

"Uranium in your town? Toronto's West End? Shutting it Down looks like the best option! now!"

 Photos by Emily Cumming



Protesters stop train on CP Rail tracks over Lansdowne Ave. uranium plant | Toronto Star
A group of anti-nuclear protesters affiliated with the Idle No More movement stopped a train in the Davenport area on Sunday after their demonstration against a nearby uranium facility migrated onto CP Rail tracks...


see also -
NEVER IDLE: IDLE NO MORE Day of Action Against G.E. Uranium Processing Plant (facebook event page)
Stop G.E.'s Uranium Factory in West End Toronto (facebook group) 
G.E.'s Uranium Secret in Toronto (blog): Did you know that GE Hitachi has a Uranium processing factory at Lansdowne & Dupont in Toronto?? Not many of us did, so now we are trying to find a solution.

special thanks to Zach Ruiter!

Friday, February 1, 2013

2.17 C.A.N. Anti-nukes Join #ForwardOnClimate Rally











Coalition Against Nukes is now a sponsor in the Forward on Climate Rally being held on Feb. 17th in Washington, DC. 
We must be responsible citizens and deliver the message that nuclear energy production is NOT GREEN. 
We are asking all who can to come! We need your presence and support there! The more signage and leafletting we bring to educate tens of thousands of people, all the better! The following is the message that the Forward on Climate Rally asks partners to spread:


Forward on Climate
President Obama must move America Forward on Climate in 2013 with decisive action to reduce dangerous carbon pollution. Obama’s legacy as 44th President of the United States of America rests squarely on his leadership in the face of an unstable climate future. Only the President of the United States has the power to lead an effort on the scale and with the urgency needed to phase out carbon-intensive fossil fuels and fire up energy efficiency and clean, renewable energy sources. The first milestone for President Obama is to reject the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline.

Join the #ForwardOnClimate Rally on 2/17! | Coalition Against Nukes

"NO NUKES" STAGING AREA
ON THE MALL / SMITHSONIAN METRO STATION (MALL EXIT) OVER BY "THE CASTLE"ASSEMBLE AT 11 AM EST

Come up out of the Smithsonian Metro Station (Mall exit) OR walk towards the "THE CASTLE" (aka Smithsonian Arts and Industries Building, the big red spiraled brick building) and look for the "No Nukes" messages on The Mall.

We will then walk over together to the Washington Monument to join the main march staging area by 11:30 AM as requested by the organizers for the march to the White House.







#BustTheMyth (twitter)

Join the #ForwardOnClimate Rally on 2/17! • 350.org

Join the #ForwardOnClimate Rally on 2/17! • Sierra Club



see also






whats up: tag= Climate


年間20ミリの避難基準を非難~国連特別報告者 - Mr. Anand Grover of "Special Rapporteur on the right to health" of the United Nations Human Rights Committee in relation to the accident at TEPCO's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power



年間20ミリの避難基準を非難~国連特別報告者 - YouTube
Video is in English

(english translation via google translate below)

東京電力福島第一原子力発電所事故に関連して11月26日、国連人権員会の「健康に対する権利に関する特別報告者」のアナンド・グローバー氏が
記者会見を開き、声明を発表した。
 
アナンド・グローバー氏は、原発事故により、日本国内の健康に関する権利が守られているかどうか調査する目的で来日。11月15日から26日の約10日、東京や福島に滞在­し、政府機関や自治体関係者、NGO、市民団体などを対象に、ヒヤリングを重ねてきた。
 
グローバー氏はまず、日本における健康の権利状況について、事故後の安定ヨウ素が配布されなかったことや、SPEEDIの情報が公開されなかったと指摘。避難基準が年間2­0ミリシーベルトに設定されている現状について、放射線管理区域の設定やチャルノブイリ事故の基準、疫学的知見などの間に一貫性が見られないと厳しく非難した。
  
また、健康調査については、対象地域が福島県に限られているのは問題だとして、汚染地域全体で実施するよう日本政府に要請。調査の項目が限られていることや、自分の医療記­録にアクセスできない状況も問題視し、包括的で、長期的な内部被曝調査やモニタリングを行うことを推奨した。
 
このほかにも、原発作業員のモニタリングや避難の権利、食品の基準、除染について言及。避難や健康調査、除染などのあり方を決定するプロセスに、子どもや妊婦、障がい者、­高齢者など、社会的弱者を含めた被害地域の住民が参加できるようにすべきだとし、今年6月に成立した「子どもお被災者支援法」の基本方針の策定に、まず、当事者を参画すべ­きだと求めた。
 
グローバー氏の調査結果は来年3月に国連人権委員会に報告され、その後6月に最終報告書が国連人権委員会理事会に提出される。




November 26, Mr. Anand Grover of "Special Rapporteur on the right to health" of the United Nations Human Rights Committee in relation to the accident at TEPCO's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power
Held a press conference, we made a statement.

Mr. Anand Grover, came to Japan in order to study the nuclear accident, health rights in Japan is whether being guarded. About 10 days of 26 days, to stay in Tokyo and Fukushima, government agencies and local governments to target those involved, NGO, and civil society organizations have been repeatedly hearing from November 15.

First, Grover and pointed out that the rights of health status in Japan, stable iodine after the accident has not been distributed, SPEEDI information has not been published. Was denounced on the state evacuation criteria is set to 20 mSv per year, and is not seen consistency criteria accident Charunobuiri settings and radiation controlled areas, such as between the epidemiological findings.

In addition, as a matter for health research, the target area have requested is limited to Fukushima Japanese government to carry out the entire contaminated area. We have recommended that an issue of the investigation and that an item is limited, even in situations where you can not access their medical records, a comprehensive survey and monitor long-term internal exposure.

In addition to this, mention rights monitoring and evacuation of nuclear workers, food standards, for decontamination. And should be in the process of determining health survey and the evacuation, the way such as decontamination, children and pregnant women, the disabled residents of the affected areas, including disabilities, such as the elderly, the socially disadvantaged is to be able to participate, in June this year I asked in the formulation of basic policy was established in the Law "your child victims," ​​First, the parties should participate.

Grover findings are reported to the UN Commission on Human Rights in March next year, the final report will be submitted to the UN Commission on Human Rights Council in June.